The Oak Ridge Reservation, a federally owned tract of ~37,000 acres spanning Anderson and Roane counties, may get a major ecological refresh. Officials have released a draft plan for how a $42 million grant will be used to restore natural resources lost through decades of contamination, and they’re now asking for your feedback.

What’s the plan about?

This grant is part of efforts to heal environmental damage caused over years by industrial, atomic, and research-related operations. The draft outlines how to rehabilitate habitats, stabilize soils, manage water systems, reintroduce native species, and undo scars from past disturbances.

Restoration will likely be phased: priority zones first, then buffer zones. Some portions may address legacy chemical contamination, streambank erosion, and invasive species. The document also includes monitoring frameworks, maintenance, and adaptive management (i.e. adjust if things don’t go as planned).

Importantly: the plan is not final. Officials want to hear from local residents, community groups, scientists, tribes, landowners, and interest groups. This is your chance to influence where money lands, what gets priority, and how “restoration” is defined.

Why does it matter?

Oak Ridge Reservation isn’t a small backwater. It has deep intersections with local water systems, habitat corridors, and community identity. Changes here ripple outward. What’s restored (or neglected) will affect downstream water quality, wildlife populations, public access, and resilience to storms or erosion.

Moreover, this is a test of participatory environmental planning. Grant plans often get drafted by agencies and handed down; here, they’re trying to include “the ground” — you, me, folks with ties to the land. If that works, it becomes a model for other restoration projects.

Risks, trade-offs, and tensions

Read full article here.